California Supreme Court
832 P.2d 899 (1992)
Philip Moncharsh (plaintiff) was an attorney employed by Heily & Blase (defendant), a law firm. Under the terms of the parties’ employment contract, if Moncharsh left Heily & Blase and continued to represent any of Heily & Blase’s clients, then Moncharsh must pay 80 percent of the fees obtained from that client to Heily & Blase. The employment contract also required that any disputes arising from the agreement must be submitted to binding arbitration. Two years after he was hired, Moncharsh left the firm and took six clients with him. Moncharsh had represented five of those clients before joining Heily & Blase. The sixth client, Ringhof, had retained Moncharsh less than two weeks before Moncharsh left the firm. Heily & Blase sought 80 percent of the fees obtained from those six clients, and the parties submitted the issue to arbitration. The arbitrator determined that Heily & Blase was entitled to 80 percent of the fees obtained from each of the clients, except for Ringhof. Because Ringhof had hired Moncharsh right before Moncharsh left the firm, the arbitrator determined that splitting Ringhof’s fees would be unconscionable. Moncharsh petitioned the trial court to vacate and modify the arbitrator’s order, arguing that the fee-splitting violated law, public policy, and the State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct. The trial court affirmed the arbitrator’s award. Moncharsh appealed to the California Court of Appeal, which affirmed. The California Supreme Court then granted review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, C.J.)
Concurrence (Kennard, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.