Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Murphy v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
493 F.3d 170 (2007)


Facts

Marrita Murphy (plaintiff) filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor against her former employer for emotional distress resulting from her former employer’s actions. Murphy argued she also suffered physical manifestations of emotional distress. The Secretary of Labor found in favor of Murphy and remanded the complaint to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for damages. The ALJ awarded Murphy $70,000, consisting of $45,000 for emotional distress and $25,000 for harm to Murphy’s reputation. Murphy paid federal income taxes on the $70,000, but later filed an amended income tax return seeking a refund of those taxes on the ground that the award was compensation for a physical injury and thus not taxable. The Internal Revenue Service denied Murphy’s refund request. Murphy brought suit against the United States (defendant), arguing that the award was not taxable because either it was not included in the definition of gross income, or was included in the exception from gross income for personal-physical-injury damages. Murphy also argued that the tax on her award was an unconstitutional direct tax. The district court ruled in favor of the United States. Murphy appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.