From our private database of 15,100+ case briefs...

National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Company Division of Textron Inc.

United States Supreme Court
416 U.S. 267 (1974)

Facts

A union sought to unionize the buyers in the plant of Bell Aerospace Company Division of Textron Inc. (Bell) (plaintiff). Bell argued that the buyers were not subject to the National Labor Relations Act (Act) because they were “managerial employees.” When this issue was subsequently litigated before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) (defendant), the NLRB reversed its earlier policy that all managerial employees were exempt from the Act. Specifically, the NLRB found that only managerial employees with labor-management responsibilities were so exempt. After concluding that the buyers at Bell’s plant had no such responsibilities, the NLRB found that they were subject to the Act. On review, a federal appellate court held that although the Board was not precluded from determining that buyers were managerial employees, it could do so only through rulemaking. The United States Supreme Court granted review of the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 288,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 15,100 briefs, keyed to 205 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Here's why 288,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 15,100 briefs - keyed to 205 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Top-notch customer support.