Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
535 F.3d 1058 (2008)


Facts

The San Francisco Peaks (peaks), located in the Coconino National Forest in the State of Arizona, were considered to be a sacred living entity by Native American tribes, including the Navajo Nation (Navajo) (plaintiff). The Navajo collected water and plants from the peaks for healing ceremonies. The Snowbowl ski area (Snowbowl) constituted 1 percent of the peaks. Due to operating losses caused by variable snowfall, the Snowbowl submitted a proposal to the United States Forest Service (USFS) (defendant) to cover the Snowbowl with artificial snow made from recycled wastewater. The Navajo sued the USFS in district court, claiming that the use of recycled wastewater substantially burdened the Navajo’s free exercise of religion, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq. RFRA provided that the government could not substantially burden the exercise of religion, unless the government demonstrated that the burden was the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest. RFRA did not define “substantial burden.” The district court denied relief to the Navajo. A three-judge panel of the court of appeals reversed in part and affirmed in part. The court of appeals heard the case en banc to reconsider the panel’s decision.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Fletcher, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.