Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co. v. United States

United States Supreme Court
212 U.S. 481 (1909)


Facts

New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company (New York Central) (defendant) was an entity bound by the federal Elkins Act (the Act) which forbade common carriers such as railroads from charging rates less than their posted rate. New York Central and one of its employees were convicted for paying rebates to certain companies who shipped their products using New York Central, thereby lowering their shipping rate in violation of the Act. New York Central appealed, arguing that parts of the Act were unconstitutional and more specifically, that Congress lacked authority to impute to a corporation the commission of criminal offenses or to subject a corporation to criminal prosecution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Day, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.