From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...
New York Central Iron Works Co. v. United States Radiator Co.
Court of Appeals of New York
66 N.E. 967 (1903)
United States Radiator Co. (Radiator) (defendant) entered into an executory contract whereby it agreed to supply New York Central Iron Works Co. (Iron Works) (plaintiff) with all of its radiator needs for the year for a specified price. Radiator supplied the radiator needs for the year until it had delivered 48,000 feet of radiation. This was the most Iron Works had required in the past, but Iron Works continued to send in orders. Radiator refused to fill the additional orders, which would have put the yearly total at over 100,000 feet of radiation. Iron Works filed suit for damages for breach of the contract. The trial court found for Iron Works. Radiator appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.