Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers

United States Supreme Court
538 U.S. 135 (2003)


Facts

Ayers and five other former employees (plaintiffs) of Norfolk & Western Railway Company (Norfolk) (defendants) contracted asbestosis at least in part from their exposure to asbestos while working at Norfolk. The plaintiffs brought suit against Norfolk under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51–60, seeking to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress based on the plaintiffs’ fear of developing cancer related to asbestosis. The plaintiffs presented evidence that asbestosis was strongly linked to cancer. The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs. Norfolk appealed, arguing that the plaintiffs could not recover damages for emotional distress based on the fear of developing cancer. Norfolk further argued that, even if the plaintiffs could recover on the fear-based theory, damages should be apportioned among other potential defendants as well as against Norfolk. The Court of Appeals of West Virginia declined to review the judgment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on the issue of whether a plaintiff with actionable asbestosis may recover damages for emotional distress based on the fear of developing cancer.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.