Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

322 F.R.D. 1 (2017)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
322 F.R.D. 1 (2017)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC and four related coal and petroleum mining companies (collectively, Oxbow) (plaintiffs) sued, alleging that Union Pacific and BNSF Railway Company (defendants) violated antitrust laws. Oxbow claimed the railroads conspired to fix fuel rates and surcharges at anticompetitive levels and maintain a monopoly. Oxbow claimed it paid $50 million in illegal fuel charges as a result and sought treble damages plus lost profits. During discovery, Oxbow produced documents from 19 records custodians. However, the railroads sought the records of William Koch, Oxbow’s founder, CEO, and principal. The railroads claimed Koch had unique information that would show market forces—not the alleged railroad conspiracy—caused increasing rail freight costs and Oxbow’s losses. Oxbow resisted the discovery as unduly burdensome, expensive, and duplicative of the documents already produced by its 19 records custodians. However, Oxbow willingly conducted a sample search to determine the relevant percentage. A vendor searched almost half a million documents from Koch’s physical and electronic files, at a cost of $57,000. About 12 percent returned as responsive, and Oxbow produced about 1,300 records from that sampling. But Oxbow estimated that searching, reviewing, and producing the remainder would cost another $85,000 and objected to production as unduly burdensome and costly. Alternatively, Oxbow asked the court to shift the production costs to the railroads.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Harvey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 744,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 744,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership