From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Passantino v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
212 F.3d 493 (2000)
Jennifer Passantino (plaintiff) went to work for Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. (CPI) (defendant) in 1979 when she was 25 years old. Passantino worked in a CPI division that was characterized by one of CPI’s own executives as an old-boys’ network. Nevertheless, Passantino was very successful and rose through the ranks to become one of CPI’s most effective female managers. However, Passantino began to suspect that she had been passed over because of her sex for promotions for which she was qualified. In 1993, Passantino and the only other female manager in her division complained to their supervisor. After Passantino and her colleague complained, CPI retaliated against Passantino in numerous ways, including by taking responsibilities and accounts from her, excluding her from managers’ meetings, and refusing to consider her for higher-level positions after she declined to accept roles that were demotions. Ultimately, Passantino filed suit against CPI under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and the Washington Law Against Discrimination. The jury found that CPI had not discriminated against Passantino initially but had retaliated against her for complaining about what she perceived as sex discrimination. The jury awarded Passantino backpay, front pay, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and punitive damages. On CPI’s motion, the district court reduced the punitive-damages award to the $300,000 Title VII cap and affirmed the remainder of the damages. CPI then moved for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial or to amend the judgment. The district court denied those motions, and CPI appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.