Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Patterson, Plaintiff v. Former Chicago Police Lt. Jon Burge

United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
328 F. Supp. 2d 878 (N.D. Ill. 2004)


Facts

Chicago Police Department Lt. Jon Burge, Sgt. John Byrne, Detectives James Pienta, William Marley, Daniel McWeeny, Joseph Danzl (defendants), and others were assigned to the 1986 investigation into the murders of Rafaela and Vincent Sanchez. Aaron Patterson (plaintiff) claims the defendants repeatedly violated his constitutional rights during the investigation, which led to his arrest and wrongful conviction. Specifically, Patterson claims that the defendants obtained coerced testimony against him from the 16-year-old niece of another suspect, threatened a suspect in an attempt to coerce additional false testimony, ignored reports that two other men committed the murders, threatened and tortured Patterson until he confessed, beat Eric Caine (Patterson’s co-defendant in the murder trial) until he confessed, and offered false reports and perjured testimony. Patterson was convicted and sentenced to death. An appellate court affirmed the conviction, and Patterson spent 13 years on death row. In response to Patterson’s claims of innocence and torture, Sgt. Byrne stated that Patterson was guilty and had never been tortured in a televised interview in December 1999. On January 10, 2003, Illinois Governor George Ryan pardoned Patterson. Patterson filed civil suit against the defendants in June 2003 for violations of his constitutional rights.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Gottschall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.