Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

People v. Curtis

California Supreme Court
450 P.2d 33 (1969)


Facts

A police officer was investigating a report of a suspected burglar, described as a six-foot black man in a white shirt and tan pants. Albert Curtis (defendant) was out walking a block from his house and happened to match that description. The officer pulled up next to Curtis and asked him to stop, and Curtis complied. The officer got out, said Curtis was under arrest, and reached for Curtis’s arm. A violent struggle ensued, injuring both men. Curtis was convicted of battery of a police officer performing his duties, a felony under California law. Curtis appealed, arguing he had a right to resist arrest because the officer lacked probable cause and used excessive force.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial