Court of Appeals of New York
69 N.Y.2d 103 (1986)
Sentry Armored Courier Corporation (Sentry) transported and stored large cash sums and performed related services for clients. John Jennings and other officers of Sentry (defendants), as well as John Finnerty (defendant), a cashier at the Hudson Valley National Bank, were indicted on several counts of second-degree grand larceny and misapplication of property. First, in a repurchase-agreement scheme, Sentry would perform a money-counting service for a client, Chemical Bank (Chemical), and then deposit the money with Finnerty along with the right to invest the money, which was secured by A-rated bonds. After 72 hours, Finnerty would then transfer the original amount to Chemical, leaving the interest in Sentry’s account. As a result, Sentry gained a total of about $17,000 in interest. Second, in a compensatory-balance matter, Jennings took approximately $100,000 from Chemical’s inventory with Sentry and deposited the money into a compensatory-balance account at Citibank. When Sentry tried to withdraw the funds, Citibank refused and froze the account. Sentry returned the inventory to Chemical with a shortage of $97,000. Third, in a misappropriation of insurance proceeds, an insurer had sent Sentry a check representing payment for losses suffered by three of Sentry’s clients due to an armed car robbery. Jennings reimbursed one of those clients for the loss but did not distribute the remainder of the proceeds to the other two clients, instead keeping the excess for himself. All counts were dismissed by the trial court, and those dismissals were later upheld by the appellate division. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Titone, J.)
Dissent (Simons, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.