Court of Appeals of New York
183 N.E.2d 319 (1962)
Young (defendant) saw an-eighteen-year-old boy being beaten by two middle-aged men on a sidewalk and decided to try to rescue the boy by attacking the middle-aged men. Young believed that the boy was being assaulted by the middle-aged men. The middle-aged men were undercover detectives attempting to arrest the boy for disorderly conduct. The boy was resisting this arrest. Young did not know that the middle-aged men were undercover detectives when he attempted to rescue the boy. Young was charged with assault, but the Appellate Division vacated the charge due to justification based on mistake of fact. The state appealed to the court of appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 238,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.