Pierce v. Cook & Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
518 F.2d 720 (10th Cir. 1975)
On January 11, 1968, Ted Pierce was killed and his two passengers, Mike Davis and Stephen Ellenwood, were injured when a tractor-trailer collided with Pierce’s automobile on an Oklahoma highway. Ted’s wife, Claudiatte Pierce (plaintiff), Davis, and Ellenwood filed suit in Oklahoma state court against the company that the truck driver worked for as an independent contractor, Cook & Co. (defendant). Cook removed all three suits to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. In order to destroy diversity, Davis dismissed his suit and his guardians re-filed his case in state court on his behalf. The federal court granted Cook’s motions for summary judgment for the two remaining plaintiffs based on the application of an Oklahoma state decision, Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. Duncan, 187 Okla. 160 (1940), which held that shippers are not liable for torts committed by independent contractors. The plaintiffs appealed, arguing that under the federal Motor Carrier Act, Cook was liable for the accident. The court of appeals affirmed, finding that state law applied. The case’s final judgment was filed in 1971. Conversely, although Davis lost in state court at the trial level, the court of appeals overturned Marion and found that independent contractors could incur tort liability on their employers. The court remanded the case, and it settled favorably for Davis in 1974. A few months later, Pierce and Ellenwood filed a Rule 60(b) motion to be relieved of the federal court’s judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Breitenstein, J.)
Concurrence (Barrett, J.)
Dissent (Lewis, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.