Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Pontifex v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
226 F.2d 909 (1955)


E. J. Pontifex (plaintiff) was using a pull-start lawnmower manufactured by Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) (defendant). The rope that was used to start the lawnmower struck Pontifex in the eye, injuring her. The rope was not affixed to a spring-recoil mechanism, as this type of mechanism was not in use when Pontifex’s lawnmower was manufactured. Spring-recoil mechanisms were used in newer lawnmowers manufactured after Pontifex’s injury. Pontifex brought suit, alleging that Sears was negligent for not designing Pontifex’s lawnmower with a spring-recoil mechanism. The district court directed a verdict for Sears. Pontifex appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial