Porter v. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services
Supreme Court of Arkansas
286 S.W.3d 686 (Ark. 2008)
The Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (plaintiff) filed a petition in juvenile court, alleging that Mark Porter and his ex-wife, Diana Rolen (defendants), had neglected their two minor daughters, including 16-year-old D.P. At trial, DHHS presented evidence that the defendants had allowed D.P. to marry 34-year-old Ralph Rodriguez in Mississippi. Rolen testified that she believed Rodriguez was 25 years old and that she had given her consent to the marriage, because she feared D.P. would run away otherwise. Porter testified that he had consented to the marriage without really knowing Rodriguez or inquiring into Rodriguez’s past. Based on the evidence, the juvenile court ordered the children to be removed from the custody of the defendants pending further investigation. Subsequently, a guardian ad litem representing D.P.’s interests filed a motion requesting the court to invalidate the marriage between D.P. and Rodriguez on the basis that the defendants’ consent was given in disregard for D.P.’s health and safety and without knowledge of Rodriguez’s true age. At a hearing, the court denied Porter’s motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that Porter’s lawful consent to D.P.’s marriage could not be a factor in determining whether the defendants had neglected their children. The trial court found that D.P. was a dependent-neglected child and ordered D.P. to remain in DHHS custody. Additionally, the trial court voided the marriage on the basis that parental consent had been obtained through coercion and misrepresentation of Rodriguez’s age and that D.P. lacked the mental capacity to enter into marriage. Porter appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.