From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Reier Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Kramer
Montana Supreme Court
72 P.3d 944 (2003)
Kramer (defendant) was the head football coach at Montana State University (MSU). Kramer entered into an agreement with Reier Broadcasting Company, Inc. (Reier) (plaintiff). Kramer agreed that, until 2004, Reier would have exclusive broadcasting rights with Kramer and that he would act as an announcer and perform other broadcasting services. The agreement contained a clause prohibiting Kramer from working with or permitting his name to be used by any other television station or program. Reier had previously purchased exclusive broadcasting rights to all MSU athletic events, which was set to expire in 2002. In 2002, when Reier’s rights expired, MSU sought bids for those rights from several broadcasting companies, including Reier, by sending out a Request for Proposal. Reier informed MSU that the certain provisions of the Request for Proposal were potentially in conflict with its contract with Kramer. MSU declined to amend its request and disqualified Reier as a potential bidder. Broadcast rights were awarded Clear Channel. MSU informed Kramer that he should ignore his contract with Reier in favor of the contract with Clear Channel. Reier filed suit and sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) to prevent Kramer from providing services under the Clear channel contract. The trial court granted the TRO. Upon hearing evidence, the trial court concluded that it could not issue an injunction specifically enforcing the contract. Reier filed a motion to alter or amend. The trial court denied the motion. Reier appealed to the Montana Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leaphart, J.)
Dissent (Cotter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.