From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Reynolds v. International Amateur Athletic Federation
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
23 F.3d 1110 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 962 (1994)
World track and field record holder in the 400 meters, Harold “Butch” Reynolds (plaintiff), tested positive for the anabolic steroid nandrolone after a urine sample was taken at an event in Monte Carlo, Monaco in August 1990. As a result, Reynolds was suspended from competition by the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) (defendant) for two years which meant that he would not be able to compete in the 1992 Olympic Games in Barcelona, Spain. The IAAF is an unincorporated association based in London, England, and made up of track and field organizations representing 205 nations. Reynolds brought suit against the IAAF in his home state of Ohio, arguing that the test results were erroneous, based in part on the fact that a urine sample taken one week prior to the Monte Carlo sample had tested negative for steroids. The IAAF did not have any offices in the U.S. and held no track events in Ohio. The district court granted Reynolds an injunction barring the enforcement of the suspension and subsequently entered a default judgment against the IAAF, awarded Reynolds $27.3 million in damages, and made the earlier injunction permanent. In order to enforce the monetary judgment, Reynolds garnished money that U.S. corporations owed the IAAF for various sponsorship deals. Thereafter, the IAAF appeared in court to quash the garnishment proceedings and to set aside the entire judgment on the basis that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The district court denied IAAF’s motion and it appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lively, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.