Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.

California Court of Appeal
204 Cal. Rptr. 86 (1984)


Facts

Ashton Development, Inc. (Ashton) (defendant) and Bob Britton, Inc. (Britton) (defendant) entered into a contract with Rich & Whillock, Inc. (Rich & Whillock) (plaintiff) for the grading and excavation of Ashton’s property, for which Britton was the general contractor. The contract stated that Rich & Whillock would provide the services for $112,900, but also stated that all rocks removed would cost extra. When Rich & Whillock found rock on the site, Rich & Whillock estimated that removing the rock would cost an extra $60,000, but made clear to Britton that the rock removal could actually cost much more. Britton agreed to pay for the extra cost. Rich & Whillock received about $190,000 in payments from Britton and submitted a final invoice to Britton for another $72,286.45. Britton refused to pay the final invoice. Rich & Whillock informed Britton that Rich & Whillock would face financial ruin if not paid. Britton offered Rich & Whillock $50,000 in satisfaction of the contract, saying that Rich & Whillock would otherwise receive nothing. Rich & Whillock, calling it “blackmail,” signed the $50,000 agreement and a document releasing the defendants from any further claims. Britton paid the $50,000. Rich & Whillock sued the defendants for the remaining $22,286.45, which the trial court awarded on the basis that the $50,000 agreement and release had been signed under economic duress. The defendants appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wiener, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.