Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Rockwell Graphic Systems, Inc. v. DEV Industries, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
925 F.2d 174 (1991)


Facts

Rockwell Graphic Systems, Inc. (Rockwell) (plaintiff) and DEV Industries, Inc. (DEV) (defendant) were competing manufactures. When Rockwell needed parts, Rockwell sometimes purchased them from outside vendors. Rockwell provided vendors with a piece-part drawing that instructed the vendor on precisely how to manufacture the needed part. Rather than patent the drawings, Rockwell kept all piece-part drawings in a vault. Rockwell required in-house engineers and outside vendors to keep the drawings confidential. In 1975, Fleck (defendant) left Rockwell and became president of DEV. Rockwell fired an employee named Peloso when a security guard caught Peloso attempting to steal piece-part drawings. Peloso then went to work for DEV. Rockwell sued DEV and Fleck, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and other claims. During discovery, Rockwell learned DEV possessed 100 of Rockwell’s confidential piece-part drawings. DEV claimed to have obtained Rockwell’s drawings lawfully. DEV also argued that Rockwell’s piece-part drawings were not protectable trade secrets, because Rockwell provided the drawings to numerous vendors and did not strictly control possession or copying of the drawings. The district court granted summary judgment to DEV, finding that Rockwell did not take reasonable steps to maintain the secrecy of the drawings.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.