Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

792 F.2d 210 (1986)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
792 F.2d 210 (1986)

Play video

Facts

Atlas Van Lines, Inc. (Atlas) (defendant) was a national moving company that controlled around 6 percent of the national interstate moving market. Atlas hired independent moving companies around the country as agents and allowed the companies to use its equipment, facilities, and services, and offered training programs for employees and drivers. Beginning in 1979, the moving industry was deregulated. Independent moving companies were given more opportunity to obtain interstate moving authority and to dictate their own prices instead of relying on major companies like Atlas for interstate authority and pricing. Independent companies that had been hired by Atlas as agents began cutting their prices to compete with Atlas. Agents acting independently were still using Atlas’s equipment, facilities, training, and services, and continued benefiting from Atlas’s reputation. As a result, Atlas enacted a policy that required its agents to operate their independent business under a separate corporation without using any of Atlas’s facilities or services. Atlas would terminate the agency contract of any agent that failed to comply with the policy. Rothery Storage & Van Co. joined with several other present and former agents (Rothery) (plaintiffs) to allege that Atlas’s policy constituted a group boycott and violated § 1 of the Sherman Act. Rothery also argued that the interstate moving market operated as an oligopoly and that Atlas’s policy was anticompetitive. The district court granted Atlas’s motion for summary judgment and Rothery appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bork, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership