Roto-Lith, Ltd. v. F.P. Barlett & Co., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
297 F.2d 497 (1962)
Roto-Lith, Ltd. (Roto-Lith) (plaintiff) offered to buy an emulsifier manufactured by F.P. Bartlett & Co., Inc. (Bartlett) (defendant), for use in making Roto-Lith's "wet" cellophane bags. Bartlett sent Roto-Lith a letter acknowledging Roto-Lith's order. The acknowledgment added a no-warranty clause disclaiming Bartlett's liability should the emulsifier prove unsatisfactory for use in wet bags and requiring Roto-Lith to protest promptly if Roto-Lith did not assent to the no-warranty clause. Roto-Lith made no such protest. Bartlett shipped the emulsifier to Roto-Lith, which accepted and paid for the emulsifier. The emulsifier was designed for "dry" bags and proved unsuitable for wet bags. Roto-Lith sued Bartlett in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The case was governed by Massachusetts law, which incorporated section 2-207 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Roto-Lith contended that Bartlett's no-warranty clause materially altered the terms on which Roto-Lith offered to buy Bartlett's emulsifiers. Roto-Lith further argued that the no-warranty clause was only a proposal that was never included in the parties' sale contract and, thus, was no defense against Roto-Lith's suit. Nevertheless, the court directed the jury's verdict for Bartlett. Roto-Lith appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Aldrich, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.