Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rouse v. Walter & Associates, L.L.C.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
513 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (2007)


Facts

Dr. Gene Rouse (plaintiff) and Dr. Doyle Wilson (plaintiff) were tenured research professors at Iowa State University (ISU). Rouse and Wilson developed a method of using ultrasounds to determine beef quality in live cattle as part of the sponsored research project. The project included development of a software program called live animal intramuscular fat prediction software (LAIPS). The copyright in the LAIPS program was assigned to the ISU Research Foundation (ISURF). Rouse and Wilson directed Dr. Viren Amin (plaintiff) to create a user interface that was compatible with the Windows operating system after new computers were purchased to allow large numbers of LAIPS images to be processed quickly. Although Amin was not hired as a software developer, he did develop software as a part of his assigned projects, which he often performed from home. The user interface program, USOFT, was never assigned to ISURF. However, upon starting at the university, the plaintiffs each signed a letter of intent that incorporated the ISU faculty handbook by reference. The faculty handbook incorporated the work-for-hire doctrine. ISURF licensed LAIPS and USOFT to Walter & Associates, L.L.C. (Walter) (defendant). Rouse, Wilson, and Amin registered a joint copyright interest in USOFT and then sent a cease-and-desist letter to Walter. Walter continued to use the software. Rouse, Wilson, and Amin sued Walter for copyright infringement. Walter filed a motion for partial summary judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gritzner, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.