Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Rowe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York
385 N.E.2d 566 (1978)


Facts

Robert Rowe (plaintiff) leased property to Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (A & P) (defendant), to use for a new location of its supermarket chain. The lease did not restrict any assignment. Years later, Rowe and A & P negotiated a new lease, which contained a percentage rental clause in addition to a base rental clause. The new lease also did not restrict A & P’s ability to assign the lease. After disappointing profits, A & P decided to close the store, and over Rowe’s objection, A & P assigned the lease to Southland Corp., another supermarket-chain operator. Rowe sued A & P for possession and damages, claiming that A & P breached an implied covenant against assignment of the lease without Rowe’s consent. A trial court dismissed the case, ruling that A & P had the right to assign the lease absent an express provision to the contrary. The court also found there was no implied covenant against assignment, because no reasonable landlord would have signed the lease without believing that A & P had the right to assign the lease. An appeals court reversed the trial court, ruling that the existence of a percentage rental clause indicated Rowe’s reliance upon characteristics specific to A & P, and thus the lease contained an implied covenant against assignment. A & P appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Gabrielli, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.