From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...
Ruckelhaus v. Monsanto Co.
United States Supreme Court
467 U.S. 986 (1984)
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) was first adopted in 1947 to regulate the use of pesticides. In 1972, Congress passed amendments to FIFRA. Among other things, it added to FIFRA a new section that governs the public disclosure of data submitted in support of an application of registration. The 1972 Amendments allowed the EPA to consider data submitted by one applicant for registration in support of another application pertaining to a similar chemical, provided that the subsequent applicant offered to compensate the original applicant. If the parties cannot agree on an amount of compensation, compensation may be determined through a binding arbitration. However, if the original party designated the information a trade secret, it could not be used by another applicant. In 1978, Congress passed new amendments that did away with the protections for trade secrets. Monsanto, a developer of pesticides, brought suit in the district court, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief from the data-disclosure provisions of FIFRA. Monsanto argued that the provisions were a taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. The district court concluded that it was a taking and that the arbitration scheme did not adequately provide compensation for the taking. The district court declared the relevant portions of FIFRA unconstitutional and enjoined the EPA from enforcing them.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.