Ryczkowski v. Chelsea Title & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Nevada
449 P.2d 261 (Nev. 1969)
In 1946, J. J. Cleary contracted to purchase land from the state of Nevada, but did not acquire title to the land until 1952. The land sale contract was not recorded. In 1949, Cleary granted a power line easement to Sierra Pacific Power Company, and the easement was recorded. Title passed through various owners until Ryczkowski (plaintiff) acquired title in 1964. Prior to acquiring title, Ryczkowski engaged Title Guaranty to search the record for defects in title, and contracted with Chelsea Title & Guaranty Co. to insure title. The title search performed only went back to 1952, when Cleary acquired title to the land. The search never uncovered the power line easement. Ryczkowski brought suit against Chelsea Title (Title Guaranty was defunct). The trial court entered judgment for Chelsea Title, holding that it could not be held liable. Ryczkowski appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.