Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

S.P. Dunham & Company v. Kudra

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
131 A.2d 306 (1957)


Facts

S.P. Dunham & Company (Dunham) (plaintiff) operated a department store. It leased its fur department to Elmer A. Hurwitz & Co. (Hurwitz). Dunham’s customers brought their fur coats to Hurwitz for storage and cleaning. Unbeknownst to Dunham’s customers, Hurwitz turned the coats over to George M. Kudra (defendant), a competitor of Dunham’s, for storage and cleaning. In November 1955, Hurwitz underwent bankruptcy. At the time, Kudra was in possession of 412 coats, for which Hurwitz owed $622.50. Dunham offered to pay the balance. However, Kudra demanded Dunham also pay Hurwitz’s additional outstanding balance of $3,232.55 before Kudra would return the coats. Dunham requested a few days to consider the demand. In the interim, many of Dunham’s customers began demanding their coats due to a drop in temperature that fall. Dunham sought further negotiations, and Kudra proposed that Kudra deliver the coats directly to Dunham’s customers and bill them directly. Dunham refused this proposal. On November 29, 1955, Dunham paid the entire sum previously demanded by Kudra. On December 15, 1955, Dunham sued Kudra, seeking a return of $3,232.55 on grounds that the amount was paid under business compulsion. The trial court ruled in Dunham’s favor. Kudra appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Clapp, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.