Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago

706 F.2d 193 (1983)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

706 F.2d 193 (1983)

Play video

Facts

Great Lakes and European Lines, Inc. (GLE), an international shipping line, secured a $3 million loan from Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company (the bank) (defendant) that was personally guaranteed by GLE’s owners, Fred and Helen Sahadi (plaintiffs). The bank later promised to increase its loan commitment. But when the business relationship between GLE, the Sahadis, and the bank deteriorated, the bank failed to follow through. GLE threatened to sue and withheld interest payments on the outstanding loan, and the bank threatened to call in that loan. After eventual negotiations, the Sahadis agreed to release the bank from any liability for its repudiation and to provide additional collateral. The bank agreed not to call in the outstanding loan if GLE paid all accrued interest by November 15. When that date passed without payment, the bank immediately called in the outstanding loan, refusing to accept GLE’s proffered interest payment one day later. The move surprised GLE, because the bank had previously accepted late payments. GLE ultimately went bankrupt, and the Sahadis faced significant personal liability. The Sahadis sued the bank in federal district court, seeking release from the personal guarantee and damages for the bank calling in the loan despite its agreement to forbear. The bank countered that GLE’s failure to meet the payment deadline constituted a material breach, entitling the bank to terminate its obligation not to call in the loan. The district court granted partial summary judgment in the bank’s favor, and the Sahadis appealed to the Seventh Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 606,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 606,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership