Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sahadi v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
706 F.2d 193 (1983)


Facts

Great Lakes and European Lines, Inc. (GLE) (plaintiff), an international shipping line, secured a $3 million loan from Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago (the Bank) (defendant) that was personally guaranteed by Fred and Helen Sahadi (plaintiff). After the business relationship between plaintiffs and the Bank deteriorated the parties entered into a contract to transfer the loan to another lender upon GLE’s payment of all outstanding interest to the Bank. A provision of the contract allowed the Bank to demand payment of the loan in full if plaintiffs failed to make an interest payment by the 15th day of each month. Thereafter, the Bank demanded full payment of the loan and interest when plaintiffs failed to timely make an interest payment. The Sahadis filed suit against the Bank in federal district court seeking release from their personal guarantee of GLE’s loan. The Bank argued that plaintiffs materially breached the agreement by failing to tender payment by the due date. The district court agreed and granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Bank. Plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Wood, Jr., J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.