Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Seattle Seahawks v. NFLPA & Sam McCullum

National Labor Relations Board
292 N.L.R.B. 110 (1989)


Facts

For five years, Sam McCullum (defendant) was a starting wide receiver for the National Football League’s (NFL) Seattle Seahawks (plaintiff). In 1981, McCullum was chosen by his teammates to be their union representative. McCullum’s union activities caused tension with the Seahawk’s coach, Jack Patera. Specifically, Patera was upset with McCullum’s organizing a “solidarity handshake” with players from the Seahawks and players from the opposing team before the first pre-season game. Additionally, McCullum remarked at a press conference that Seahawks team doctors released injured players for games too soon when they had not fully recovered. At the end of training camp, the Seahawks obtained another wide receiver, Roger Carr, and cut McCullum from the team. McCullum and the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) (defendant) filed an unfair labor practice claim with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). At trial, the administrative law judge (ALJ) found the Seahawk’s decision to cut McCullum was influenced by Patera’s anti-union sentiments directed at McCullum. The Seahawk’s appealed the decision to the NLRB.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Board.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Johansen, Member.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.