Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sentinel Acceptance Ltd., L.P. v. Hodson Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals
45 S.W.3d 464 (Mo. App. 2001)


Facts

Janet Hodson (defendant), a Missouri resident, was the president of Hodson Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc. (Hodson Auto) (defendant). Hodson's husband managed the day-to-day affairs of the company while she worked offsite. Sentinel Acceptance, Ltd. (Sentinel) (plaintiff) instituted arbitration proceedings against Hodson and Hodson Auto in California and secured an arbitral award of $16,052.11. Sentinel then filed the award with a California superior court, which entered a judgment confirming the arbitration award. Next, Sentinel registered the California judgment with a Missouri circuit court, seeking garnishment against Hodson and Hodson Auto to satisfy the judgment. Hodson claimed she was not personally served with any information about the arbitration and knew nothing about it. According to Hodson, her husband retained California counsel for her, who put in an appearance and responded to Sentinel's confirmation proceedings on her behalf, all without her knowledge. Hodson's California counsel confirmed that he had no contact with Hodson, only her husband. Hodson moved the Missouri circuit court to quash the registration of the California judgment on the basis of surprise, because she had no knowledge of the California proceedings against her. The trial judge quashed the registration, based on a Missouri rule providing that a foreign judgment registered in the state "is subject to the same procedures, defenses, and proceedings for reopening, vacating, or staying as a judgment of a circuit court" in Missouri. Sentinel appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Breckenridge, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.