United States Supreme Court
509 U.S. 630 (1993)
After the 1990 census, North Carolina became entitled to a twelfth seat in the United States House of Representatives. The General Assembly enacted a reapportionment plan that included one majority-African American congressional district. Attorney General to the United States Janet Reno (defendant) disapproved of the plan. The General Assembly then enacted a revised plan that included a second majority-African American district. Shaw (plaintiff) challenged the plan in federal district court on the ground that the plan’s creation of district boundary lines of dramatically irregular shape constitutes unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. The district court held that Shaw had not stated a claim upon which relief could be granted, and Shaw appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (O’Connor, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Souter, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 201,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.