Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker

Supreme Court of California
765 P.2d 498 (1989)


Facts

Three clients (clients) of the law firm Albert & Oliker (A&O) (defendant) agreed to sell an apartment building to Sheldon Appel Company (Sheldon) (plaintiff). Under the sales agreement, the clients would receive cash from the sale of the building and a percentage of proceeds from the sales of the individual condominiums (condos). The clients later learned that Sheldon was offering to sell the entire building. The clients consulted A&O and filed a complaint against Sheldon, seeking a declaration of rights and an equitable lien on the property. A&O recorded a lis pendens on the property on behalf of the clients. Sheldon moved to expunge the notice of lis pendens. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint. Sheldon later abandoned its plan to sell the building and instead began to sell the individual condos. A&O filed a new action on behalf of the clients, seeking damages for breach of contract. Sheldon filed a cross-complaint for malicious prosecution, alleging that A&O had asserted an untenable lien claim and recorded an impermissible lis pendens. The trial court severed the breach-of-contract claim from the malicious-prosecution claim. The trial court submitted the issue of probable cause on the malicious-prosecution claim to the jury. A&O won the breach-of-contract claim and obtained a $720,000 judgment. The jury in the malicious-prosecution case awarded Sheldon $82,000 in compensatory damages and $1 million in punitive damages. A&O appealed the award in the malicious-prosecution case, and the court of appeal affirmed. The state supreme court granted review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Arguelles, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.