From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 1 (1941)
Hertha Sibbach (plaintiff) was injured in an automobile accident involving Wilson & Co. (Wilson) (defendant). Sibbach sued Wilson for negligence. Wilson moved for an order requiring Sibbach to submit to a physical examination pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the Rules), and the court granted the motion. Sibbach refused to comply and was held in contempt under Rule 37. Sibbach appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit affirmed. Sibbach petitioned the United States Supreme Court and argued that Rule 35 and Rule 37 are invalid because they exceed the mandate of Congress to the Supreme Court in the Rules Enabling Act.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, J.)
Dissent (Frankfurter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.