Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. v. Burroughs Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
874 F.2d 653 (1989)


Facts

Sierra Diesel Injection Service, Inc. (Sierra) (plaintiff) was a family-operated servicer of diesel engines. Sierra was interested in purchasing a posting machine to help with invoicing and bookkeeping. Sierra contacted Burroughs Corporation (Burroughs) (defendant). Burroughs advised Sierra to purchase a B-80 computer rather than a posting machine. Sierra’s owner, James Cathey, was not familiar with computers or contracts, let alone accounting software or bookkeeping devices. Relying on the advice from Burroughs, Cathey signed a sales contract buying the B-80 for Sierra. The contract contained language in all capital letters disclaiming all warranties, including the implied warranty of merchantability and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. The disclaimer language appeared on the back of the contracts, and only some of the language was in bold lettering. Sierra soon discovered the B-80 was incapable of performing bookkeeping functions. Sierra had to purchase a new computer from a different company. Sierra sued Burroughs for breach of warranty. Burroughs argued that all warranties were disclaimed by the contract. The district court held that the disclaimer provision was not conspicuous, and that the warranties were not excluded. Burroughs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stephens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Canby, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.