Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing Comm'n

Supreme Court of California
913 P.2d 909 (Cal. 1996)


Facts

Evelyn Smith (plaintiff) owns and rents out several apartments. Due to her religious belief that sex outside marriage is sinful, she refuses to rent her apartments to unmarried couples. Gail Randall and Kenneth Phillips, an unmarried couple, leased an apartment from Smith after telling her that they were married. Before occupying the apartment, Phillips told Smith that they were unmarried. She then refused to rent the apartment to them and returned their deposit. Randall and Phillips filed complaints against Smith with the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission (defendant), claiming that she had violated California statutes prohibiting discrimination on the basis of marital status by owners of housing accommodations. The Commission determined that Smith had violated the law, and Smith sought judicial review. She claimed that she discriminated against the couple because of their extramarital sexual intercourse and not because of their marital status. She also claimed that the anti-discrimination law violated her state and federal constitutional rights to free exercise of religion. The California Court of Appeal reversed the Commission’s decision, and the state supreme court granted review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.