Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Southern Burlington County, NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel

New Jersey Supreme Court
336 A.2d 713 (N.J. 1975)


Facts

Under Mount Laurel’s (defendant) zoning regulations, 29% of land in the town was zoned exclusively for industry, but only a tiny fraction of that was actually used for industrial purposes and the rest was left undeveloped. In addition, the areas that were actually zoned for residential use were under restrictions that effectively made it so only those with a higher income could live there. These ordinances were put in place because of the tax structure in New Jersey. Because of the town’s need to cover the high costs of schools, it sought primarily buildings with high tax rates—specifically industrial buildings and expensive homes. As a result of this practice, low and moderate income families were effectively prevented from living in the town. The NAACP of Southern Burlington County (NAACP) (plaintiff) brought suit claiming that the combined land use regulations unlawfully exclude low and moderate income families from the town.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.