Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Stanley v. University of Southern California

178 F.3d 1069 (1999)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Stanley v. University of Southern California

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

178 F.3d 1069 (1999)

Facts

Marianne Stanley (plaintiff) was head coach of the women’s basketball team at the University of Southern California (USC) (defendant). George Raveling was head coach of USC’s men’s basketball team. Stanley was paid less than Raveling. The head basketball coaches had similar job duties in terms of running basketball programs, but the men’s basketball program generated more revenue for USC. The parties disputed why Raveling was seemingly able to generate more revenue for USC, with Stanley claiming it was because of historic and ongoing discrimination by USC. Regardless, Raveling had 17 more years of experience coaching basketball, previously coached the Olympic men’s basketball team, had twice been named national coach of the year, received other prestigious accolades, had nine years of marketing experience, and authored several books on basketball. Stanley did not possess these same qualifications and experience. Stanley negotiated with USC’s athletic director, Michael Garrett (defendant) to extend her current employment contract. During these negotiations, Stanley demanded the same salary as Raveling. Stanley’s contract ultimately expired without renewal. Stanley sued USC and Garrett asserting various claims based on sexual discrimination, including under the Equal Pay Act. On summary judgment, the district court ruled in USC and Garrett’s favor. Stanley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hug, C.J.)

Dissent (Pregerson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership