Illinois Supreme Court
132 N.E.2d 519 (1956)
Riggins (defendant) was the owner and operator of a collection agency that employed dozens of people and was responsible for nearly 500 individual and firm accounts. One account belonged to Dorothy Tarrant, who owned a business. Riggins and Tarrant had an oral agreement that Riggins would be responsible for collecting Tarrant’s delinquent accounts in exchange for a varying percentage of the total amount. It was also agreed that Riggins did not need to account for the amounts collected until a bill was paid in full, at which time Riggins would send a check to Tarrant. There was a conflict as to whether Riggins was to give a check to Tarrant for the whole amount collected and then receive his commission or whether he was authorized to deduct his commission and remit the remainder to Tarrant. Riggins and Tarrant abided by their agreement for nearly two years. During that time, Tarrant exercised no control over Riggins as to the time or manner of collecting on the delinquent accounts and also had knowledge that Riggins comingled her funds collected with those of every other client in a single account which he also used for personal expenses. When Tarrant learned that Riggins had collected several of her accounts in full but had not paid her, she pressed charges. Riggins was found guilty of embezzlement and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hershey, C.J.)
Dissent (Schaefer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.