Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Tennessee v. Hatcher

Tennessee Supreme Court
310 S.W.3d 788 (2010)


Facts

On April 3, 2001, Shawn Hatcher (defendant), his brother Chris Hatcher, Cornelius Jefferson, and Dan Smith went to an apartment in Memphis. Upon entering the apartment, Shawn, Chris, Jefferson, and Smith began shooting at the apartment’s three occupants. One of the occupants, Marcel Mackey, was killed, and the other two occupants were shot but survived. Shawn was eventually arrested and gave the police a detailed statement approximately eight months after the shooting occurred. Shawn told the police that he had been drinking alcohol and smoking marijuana throughout the day of the shooting, but did not drink or smoke for a few hours before the crime. Shawn provided a detailed timeline of the day and explained how he, Chris, Jefferson, and Smith ended up at the apartment where they shot the victims. Shawn admitted that he was at the apartment during the shooting. Shawn was subsequently charged with multiple crimes and convicted of first-degree premeditated murder of Mackey, an alternative count of first-degree felony murder of Mackey, and attempted first-degree premeditated murder of the other two occupants. Shawn appealed, arguing that the trial court erred when it declined to instruct the jury on voluntary intoxication. The court of criminal appeals determined that Shawn was not entitled to relief. Shawn appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.