Thompson v. Kacinski
Iowa Supreme Court
774 N.W.2d 829 (2009)
James Kacinski (defendant) and Michelle Lockwood (defendant) (collectively Defendants) disassembled a trampoline and placed the pieces untethered near the roadway in front of their house in order for them to be picked up during trash collection. One evening, a storm with heavy winds blew the top of the trampoline into the middle of the road. The following day, Charles Thompson and his wife (the Thompsons) were driving along the road. Charles swerved to miss the trampoline top, lost control of his vehicle, and entered a ditch where the car rolled several times. The Thompsons filed suit against Defendants for negligence. Defendants moved for summary judgment and argued they owed no duty under the circumstances to the Thompsons because the risk that the trampoline top would move from their yard to the middle of the roadway was not foreseeable. The trial court granted Defendants’ motion. The Thompsons appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling. The Iowa Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.