Tiffany Inc. v. eBay Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)
eBay, Inc. (eBay) (defendant) was an online marketplace where third parties sellers operated. Tiffany Inc. (Tiffany) (plaintiff), a high-end jewelry chain, discovered that counterfeit Tiffany jewelry was being sold on eBay. Among other methods designed to stop the practice, Tiffany sent eBay demand letters and filed Notice of Claimed Infringement (NOCI) forms. The demand letters did not specify which sellers were infringing Tiffany’s trademark. The NOCIs did identify specific sellers. Upon receiving a NOCI, eBay removed the identified listing(s) and suspended repeat offenders from its service. Tiffany brought suit against eBay for contributory trademark infringement, among other things. The district court found that eBay was not liable for contributory infringement. Tiffany appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sack, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.