Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Titus v. Bradford, B. & K. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
20 A. 517 (Pa. 1890)


Facts

Bradford, B. & K. R. Co. (Bradford) (defendant) was a railroad company that operated a narrow gauge railroad track. Bradford’s business was transporting over to its tracks the unloaded and loaded railroad cars belonging to other major carriers using standard gauge railroad tracks. To accomplish this, Bradford used a “hoist” to move the car bodies onto its own flat cars specifically designed for more narrow tracks. Most cars from other carriers had flat bottoms and thus sat securely on top of Bradford’s cars. However, some car bodies, called “Nypano” cars, had slightly rounded bottoms and thus did not sit securely. Bradford employees typically bolted these cars down or tied them down with telegraph wire. Titus’ (plaintiff) decedent worked on Bradford’s railroad for over two years and was very familiar with Nypano cars. On June 7, 1888, he was riding on top of one Nypano car while the train was moving. The cars appeared to be securely wired on. However, as the train rounded a sharp turn, the car on which Titus’ decedent was sitting began to sway and start to tip over. The decedent ran forward but was unable to jump to the next car in time. He fell to the tracks and was killed when the next car in line ran over him. Titus brought suit against Bradford on the ground that the company was negligent in transporting standard-size car bodies on narrow gauge tracks. The jury awarded Titus $5,325 in damages, and Bradford appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.