Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority

550 U.S. 330, 127 S. Ct. 1786 (2007)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,500+ case briefs...

United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority

United States Supreme Court

550 U.S. 330, 127 S. Ct. 1786 (2007)

Play video

Facts

In the late 1980s, Oneida and Herkimer counties of New York faced a solid waste crisis due to mismanagement of their landfills and other waste disposal sites. Several existing landfills were shut down, and the two counties formed the Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority (OHSWMA) (defendant), a public benefit corporation, to collect, process, and dispose of solid waste in the counties. In 1989, the counties and the OHSWMA entered into an agreement where the OHSWMA would exclusively manage all processing of waste generated in the counties. The OHSWMA collected tipping fees from each load of waste processed to help fund its operations. To avoid the tipping fees certain citizens attempted to send their waste to out-of-state waste processors. In response to this, the OHSWMA passed “flow control” ordinances, which required all waste produced within the counties be delivered to OHSWMA’s processing sites. In 1995, United Haulers Assn., Inc. (plaintiff), a trade association made up of solid waste management companies operating in the two counties, sued the OHSWMA on the grounds that the flow ordinances violated the Commerce Clause because they discriminated against interstate commerce. United Haulers introduced evidence that without the laws, they could dispose of waste in out-of-state sites for significantly cheaper costs than waste disposed of in the OHSWMA’s sites. The district court ruled in favor of United Haulers Assn, Inc., but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roberts, C.J.)

Concurrence (Scalia, J.)

Concurrence (Thomas, J.)

Dissent (Alito, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 545,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 545,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,500 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership