United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 39 (1966)
Adams (plaintiff) secured a patent for a non-rechargeable electrical battery comprised of magnesium and cuprous chloride electrodes, which used water as battery fluid. After filing for the patent, Adams presented his invention to the United States Government (defendant). Although the Government originally determined that the battery was unworkable, it subsequently changed its position and ultimately began using the battery without notifying Adams. Adams filed a patent infringement suit against the Government. The Government contended that the patent was invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In support of its argument, the Government presented various patents and treatises describing zinc and silver chloride batteries, and contemplating the use of a magnesium electrode but intimating that such use would not be successful. The Government contended that these prior references taught the substitution of a magnesium electrode for zinc, as Adams did in his patented battery. In addition, the Government offered prior art patents purportedly teaching the substitution of a cuprous chloride electrode for a silver chloride one. Although none of the references specifically suggested that a water-activated battery using magnesium would be successful, the Government contended that Adams’ battery was not patentable because wet batteries utilizing zinc and silver chloride were known in the art at the time of filing, and additional prior art established that magnesium and cuprous chloride could be substituted for zinc and silver chloride. The Trial Commissioner held the patent valid and infringed. The Court of Claims affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.