United States v. Johnson
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2011)
Undra Demetrius Johnson (defendant) was convicted of a sex offense in 1995. The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), was enacted in July 2006. In February 2007, the United States attorney general (AG) issued an interim regulation that went into immediate effect to apply SORNA retroactively, without complying with the notice-and-comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. In the preamble to the interim rule, the AG explained that the APA’s good-cause exception excused compliance with rulemaking procedures, primarily because retroactive application was consistent with Congress’s goal of SORNA protecting the public from sex offenders. The AG accepted post-promulgation comments through April 30, 2007, but did not respond to those comments. Days later, the AG commenced rulemaking for implementing all aspects of SORNA, including retroactive application of the registration requirement. After the AG received and responded to comments on SORNA’s retroactivity, the final regulations went into effect in July 2008. After moving to Mississippi in 2008, Johnson failed to register with the state’s sex-offender registry as required by SORNA. Johnson was convicted in federal district court for violating SORNA. Johnson appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, challenging the AG’s promulgation of rules applying SORNA retroactively.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.