United States v. Marshall
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
908 F. 2d 1312 (1990)
Stanley Marshall and three others (defendants) were convicted of distributing or intending to distribute lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). The defendants were given prison sentences ranging from five to 20 years, based on the weight of the blotter sheets to which the LSD was adhered. The defendants’ sentences were mandatory minimum periods of imprisonment established by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. § 841. The CSA determined minimum sentences in accordance with the weight of the mixture or substance containing the illegal drug. The defendants appealed their sentences, arguing that for purposes of the CSA, the relevant weight was that of the LSD alone, not that of the LSD and blotter sheets combined.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)
Dissent (Posner, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.