Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

United States v. Peterson

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
483 F.2d 1222 (1973)


Facts

Bennie Peterson (defendant) came out of his house and discovered Charles Keitt stealing windshield wipers from his car, which was parked in the alley behind Peterson’s property. Peterson argued with Keitt, then went back inside and got a gun. When Peterson returned, Keitt was about to drive off. Peterson threatened to kill Keitt. Keitt got out of the car, grabbed a lug wrench, and walked toward Peterson with the wrench in the air. Peterson told Keitt not to come closer. Keitt advanced, though he was still in the alleyway, and Peterson shot and killed him. Peterson was standing in his yard at the time. Peterson was indicted for second-degree murder. At trial, Peterson sought a judgment of acquittal based on insufficient evidence, which was denied. The judge instructed the jury on self-defense. The judge said that self-defense generally does not excuse a killing if the defendant provoked the altercation, though words alone did not constitute provocation. The judge also told the jury that even if Peterson started the fight, self-defense was available if he withdrew from the conflict in good faith and let Keitt know by words or acts. The judge instructed the jury that Peterson was under no duty to retreat but it could consider whether he could have safely retreated in deciding whether his actions were justified. Peterson was found guilty of manslaughter. Peterson appealed, arguing that the judge wrongly instructed the jury.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Robinson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.