United States v. Salerno
United States Supreme Court
505 U.S. 317 (1992)
Salerno et al. (defendants) were charged with RICO violations and other federal crimes. At a grand jury hearing, two owners of a concrete firm allegedly a part of the racketeering ring testified that neither they nor their firm had participated in the ring. At trial, however, the owners of the firm invoked their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. As a result, Salerno et al. sought to introduce the owners’ testimony from the grand jury proceeding under Rule 804(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The district court admitted the testimony and convicted the owners. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed, stating that the “similar motive” requirement of the rule does not apply when the government obtains immunized testimony in a grand jury proceeding from a witness who refuses to testify at trial. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.