United States v. United Mine Workers
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 258 (1947)
Labor disputes developed between United Mine Workers (Workers) (defendant) and the United States (plaintiff), which was in control of the mines. Workers President John L. Lewis (defendant) terminated the employment contract. The United States sued Lewis and Workers, requesting a judgment stating that Workers had no right to terminate the contract and a temporary restraining order (TRO) and injunction barring the defendants from inciting a strike or impeding the court. A TRO was granted pending a hearing on the injunction. The miners went on strike, and the United States petitioned for a show cause order requiring the defendants to give reasons why they should not be held in contempt. The court granted the order, and the defendants challenged jurisdiction on the ground that the Norris-LaGuardia Act (NLA) barred the issuance of an injunction. The defendants moved for dismissal of the show cause order. The judge concluded that the NLA did not apply to the United States and denied the motion. The TRO was extended. The defendants were found guilty of contempt and Lewis and Workers were ordered to pay $10,000 and $3.5 million, respectively. The court issued a preliminary injunction, and the defendants appealed to the court of appeals. The court of appeals issued a stay, and the United States petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1), allowing the petition prior to the court of appeals’ final ruling. The defendants also petitioned for certiorari, which was granted.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Vinson, C.J.)
Concurrence (Frankfurter, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Black, J.)
Dissent (Murphy, J. and Rutledge, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,500 briefs, keyed to 184 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.