W.R. Grace & Co. v. Taco Tico Acquisition Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
454 S.E.2d 789 (1995)
W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. and Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (Del Taco) (defendants) operated Mexican restaurants in the southeastern United States. Taco Tico Acquisition Corporation and Taco Tico, Inc. (Taco Tico) (plaintiffs) operated Mexican restaurants in the Midwest and in the western United States. Taco Tico entered into negotiations to acquire Del Taco. The parties signed a non-binding letter of intent containing the proposed terms for the acquisition. The letter of intent stated that, notwithstanding any past, present, or future representations by either party, neither party would be under any legal obligation relating to the transaction until a formal agreement was executed. The parties also executed a management services agreement, under which Taco Tico agreed to manage Del Taco for a nominal monthly fee while the parties attempted to complete the transaction. Throughout these negotiations, both parties were represented by experienced businessmen acting with the advice of counsel. Taco Tico later made proposals for completing the transaction that were different from the terms in the letter of intent. Del Taco told Taco Tico that the proposed acquisition would not happen and terminated the management agreement. Taco Tico sued Del Taco for fraud, rescission of the agreement, promissory estoppel, and quantum meruit for the management services it had provided to Del Taco. Del Taco moved for a directed verdict on the promissory estoppel claim, based on the language of the agreement between the parties. The trial court denied the motion. The jury found in favor of Del Taco on the claims for fraud and rescission, but awarded damages to Taco Tico on its claims of promissory estoppel and quantum meruit. Del Taco appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Birdsong, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.